Northside Hospital FL problems

Where failure to care has the potential to maim--and more.

My Photo
Name:
Location: Tampa Bay, Florida, United States

I am a freelance writer with a BA in Mass Communications from the University of South Florida St. Petersburg. Please check out my production site: http://robinshwedoproductions.weebly.com and e-portfolio at http://rjshwedo.weebly.com. A few of my favorite quotes are: "...Comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable" (Finley Peter Dunne); "Pray for the dead and fight like hell for the living" (Mother Jones); "The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing" (Albert Einstein). Some things inspire me: people who strive to make a positive difference; sunrise or sunset--especially at the beach. Some things that make me angry: those who can't be bothered to do what's right; the fact that the medical and legal system frequently looks at people's finances before deciding whether or not that person should have access to their services...I could go on...

Sunday, October 24, 2010

We settled

Today is the 4th anniversary of Paul's death. Here is what I can report: We have settled with Northside Hospital for an undisclosed amount of money.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Monday, March 01, 2010

Letter

This is what I received shortly after the Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) investigated the hospital, less than two weeks after P__'s death. Yes, I have covered my name and address, along with the CCR# which IDs the complaint.

The line that I find particularly interesting is the lone-line paragraph a little over half-way down the page: "There were violations of State and Federal Regulations identified relative to the allegations and deficiencies were cited."

Labels: , , , , , ,

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Re-Mediation

Last week, my attorney and I were in a second mediation with N.side hospital. We had gone through one mediation process last summer. At the moment, we're still set for trial this fall.

Before signing with my current attorney, another attorney advised that I could go several routes (besides finding someone to take the case). The routes advised were: Contact the Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA); protest on the sidewalk in front of the hospital (as long as it was not on hospital grounds or interfering with traffic or business); and start a blog. I was advised that if I did start a blog, I should simply state the truth without any embellishments.

So...I contacted AHCA. They were at the hospital in a relatively short period of time; what they found was not good.

As far as protesting in front of the hospital, that did not appear to be an option I was willing to do. While it may have turned some people away, gotten approval from "the common person" (you and me) and aggravated those in charge at the hospital, I didn't think at the time that it would get the message across to the widest number of people.

The blog idea, though, is a good one. Throughout this blog, I have simply stated the truth. I know what I observed. I have had no reason to embellish or misconstrue the truth. Embellishments and outright lies would only harm my case in many ways: it would damage my credibility; it would make the rest of what I said suspect; it would hurt those who the lies were against; it would be 100% wrong. Add to that that the facts of this case are bad enough...Why would I do that?

The truth has been told all along and needs to be heard. I'm sure that those who have contacted me with their own horror stories of N.side would agree.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Friday, February 05, 2010

Trial Date changed

This past week, I learned that the trial date has changed: Rather than over the summer, the trial is now slated for the fall of 2010.

Yes, this means that it will be that much longer that my life is on hold. But I have no intention of leaving before this is over. I have every intention of seeing this through.

Will it make me stinking rich? I doubt it. Will the hospital admit guilt? I doubt that, too. Will the truth come out? You'd better believe it.

Ya can't go around treating people like garbage and think that it's okay.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Monday, January 04, 2010

The past two years

Northside Hospital temporarily closed to ambulances after license expires, found at http://www.tampabay.com/news/health/article992788.ece and http://www.sptimes.com/2008/02/23/Southpinellas/State_threatens_North.shtmlhttp://www.sptimes.com/2008/02/23/Southpinellas/State_threatens_North.shtml, found at http://www.sptimes.com/2008/02/23/Southpinellas/State_threatens_North.shtml . Both articles were from the St. Petersburg Times.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Moving forward

At the moment, the trial (The Estate of P___ Lastname v. Northside Hospital) is slated for next summer. When the time is closer, I'll see about posting about.

In the meantime, I keep hearing that we have to keep things legal. This is how it should be. If we start talking in mistruths, then nothing good can come of this. We also have to keep things within the confines of the law. Again, this is how it should be.

The only problem I have is that sometimes we can't get into ethics. We can only litigate against a medical person or facility when they legally or medically have screwed up. We technically can't go after them when their ethics harm or kill someone.

At USFSP, if a student majors in journalism, they must take a semester of Ethics. How about for medicine? Are there no ethics classes for doctors, nurses or hospital/nursing home administrators? If not, why not? And if so, how many who took the class forgot what they learned? If there aren't classes in ethics, shame on medical and business schools. If there are and people have forgotten their ethics, shame on those who forgot.

Karma's a boil on the butt of those who forget the Golden Rule.

Labels: , , , , ,

Friday, December 21, 2007

Wednesday's meeting

This past Wednesday, my attorney and I met with an attorney from N.side, along with someone from risk management for unsworn depositions. Of course, I can't go into detail on what happened. But I will state: N.side's people did not seem happy.

Which is fine with me.

Now comes the wait-and-see.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Saturday, December 15, 2007

First Meeting

My attorney and I are scheduled to meet with N.side's attorneys on Wednesday, December 19, 2007. It won't be sworn depositions--not yet, anyway. But this is where N.side's attorneys hear our side of the case.

Should be interesting.

I wish I could write more. But those of you who have followed this blog thus far can understand why I can't, at this point in time.

Let's just say, things are heating up.

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, November 07, 2007

And the clock is ticking...

I received a letter from the attorney today; it was a copy of the letter sent to N.side, putting them on notice. The hospital now has 90 days in which to either respond to the attorney. If they don't respond, it looks like we'll then request a court date.

I would love to share every little detail in the letter from the lawyer. However, at this point, it would be better for me to remain silent. The truth will come out soon enough, without my jeopardizing the case.

I did, however, want everyone who has followed this saga thus far to know what is happening, that, indeed, things are now really progressing. When I can reveal more, I will.

Sometime in the next few days, I may repost the timeline of P__'s hospital stay. Anyone wishing to read (or reread) it, please be advised it was originally posted in December.

One last thought: Those who've had problems similar to what has been revealed on this blog, be assured that, if one follows through legally, you have a chance of making a difference for those around you. You may not bring your loved one back, but you can make a difference for others. Please keep that in mind.

Labels: , , , ,

Sunday, August 19, 2007

In Response

There is a recent comment posted to my August 7th entry ("Well, it's about time...") from a nurse who worked at Northside. I wanted to respond.

First of all, thank you for your condolences.

Now, for the nitty-gritty here: FOR-PROFIT HOSPITALS!!! Nurse, you hit the nail square on the head. I want to thank you for telling it from a nursing stand-point. My sister was a nurse for a number of years in one of the local HCA hospitals (no, not Northside, but that's as much as I'm saying, unless I have her permission to state which one). I knew that there were other HCA hospitals in the area.

From what I have read/studied/discovered, when a hospital is a for-profit facility, the profit-margin (or bottom-line) becomes the Most Important Part of any decision. Why? Profits. (No brainer here.)

For example: Let's say you have a ward with 30 rooms, 2 beds each, for a possible 60 patients. Well, if the hospital can get by with 2-3 nurses for that ward (rather than 6-8), then have them work 12-hour shifts (rather than 8), look at the savings. Now, say we're paying the RNs an average of $25/hour. Three nurses per twelve hour shift times two shifts per day comes to $1,800 (3 X 12 X 2), while having eight nurses for each of three-eight hour shifts comes to $4,800 a day. There's a salary savings of $3,000/day/ward--and that isn't even figuring in the benefits, such as health and life insurance, worker's comp, etc. (Therefore, better for profits if you have two-12 hour shifts, rather than three-8 hour shifts per day.)

What does this mean for the nursings staff? Rapid burn-out. Why? It's simple: if a person is over-worked in a facility that is understaffed, expected by doctors, management, etc. to do the majority of the hands-on patient care, while trying to keep up with the demands of the patients, you're going to find yourself chronically exhausted and, in the end, burned-out.

True, we need hospitals, but to put profits above patient care is inexcusable.

Then, there's the toll that it takes on the patients. If the theoretical 30-room-2-bed-per-room ward is full and there are only three nurses working the floor for a 12-hour shift, what kind of care can a patient expect at the end of that shift?

That said, there were definite screw-ups on my husband's care. How much was from exhaustion, how much from burn-out, how much from a simple "I don't care" attitude, I don't know.

According to a paper I did this past spring for an expository writing class, if you have two hospitals across the street from each other, identical in every way--same services, same types of wards, same out-patient services, etc--except that one hospital is a For-Profit facility, the other is a Not-For-Profit facility, your chances of dying in the For-Profit is between 5-25% higher than the Not-For-Profit (depending on whose statistics you look at). We're not looking at critical-care-patients vs. patients in for a simple X-ray; we're comparing similar patients. And while 5% may not seem like a big deal, that's still 5 people out of 100; 50 out of 1,000.

Nurse, while your hot-button issues are taken from the front-lines of the hospital and mine (at least here) are from the patient/patient's family's point-of-view, it sounds like we have the same complaint here: FOR-PROFITS are a death waiting to happen.

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, July 12, 2007

So, what are they hiding?

I talked with the main attorney's office this afternoon (after reviewing some paperwork that they had sent me). I found out that N.side still hasn't sent out P__'s records. Apparently, N.side has been stalling...and stalling...and stalling about the records.

I won't go into details at the moment, as I'm really not sure how much I can say at this stage of the game, what with lawyers, etc. However, my question is this: If N.side has done nothing wrong, what the heck is their problem with sending out the records? To my way of thinking, the only reason that they'd have to not hand over the records (which are, if I remember correctly, legal documents) is that they know they're in the wrong and/or they're doctoring the records.

By the way, I found a way to see the story that WFLA did on the missing insulin pump and N.side hospital. Click on: http://tbo.com/membercenter/contactus/8oys.htm , then click on the tab at the top of the page that says, "Video Reports." After a short (maybe 15 second) video, you should see a grey/white box immediately to the right of the video screen. Click on "Insulin Pump" (you may have to scroll down a little to find that). Viola!

Yup, you can't make this stuff up...

Labels: , , , , ,

Tuesday, July 10, 2007

Repost for newbies...

This will be a repost for anyone new to the blog. It is basically a repost of April 9's post:

For anyone new here who doesn't want to go looking for what happened to my husband at Northside, I'm going to repost what happened here:

Wedneday, Oct. 18, 2006

P__ requested that I call 911, as he was having trouble breathing. We wanted him to go to Bayfront Medical Center as P__ had received good care there in the past, as well as the fact that Bayfront has the only Trauma Center in Pinellas County. Instead, P__ was taken by ambulance to Northside Hospital, an HCA hospital.

Once at Northside’s Emergency Room, the staff responded quickly, within minutes. Dr. T___ was on-call at the time. (I’m not sure if he is a resident, intern, or if he has completed residency.) Dr. T___ attempted to use a facemask to assist P__ with his breathing, but when it became apparent that this was not helping, P__ was intubated. P__ was placed on Diprivan to keep him sedated. The RN assigned to P__ (A.) mentioned that, since many people are sensitive to Diprivan, he would keep a close watch on how it affected P__, which he did. As soon as P__’s blood pressure started to bottom out (at one point, down to 52/35), A. backed off the Diprivan to bring P__’s B.P. back, saying that once the BP came up, he’d try to find a happy medium.

Meanwhile, P__ started to regain consciousness, becoming combative. Dr. T___ came in and, with his face literally inches from P__’s, started screaming at P__ to calm down. At that point, A. came in and physically had to move Dr. T___ out of the way to administer medication. Later, when I asked, Dr. T___ said that he yelled at P__ because “P__ is deaf.” When I asked how he figured that, he stated that he “knew” this because “he has white hair and he’s 71, therefore, he’s deaf.” He never bothered to ask if P__ was deaf (he wasn’t), just assumed. This assumption was not a big deal, but it begs the questions: What else does he assume about his patients? How does this affect their treatment?

P__ was brought up to the CCU later the same day.

I requested both in the Emergency Room and the CCU that P__ be transferred to Bayfront Medical as soon as possible for two reasons: (1) it was our preference (due to better care), and (2) our insurance, United Health Care (Medicare Complete) didn’t have a contract with HCA hospitals at that time.

Thursday, Friday October 19, 20

Both days are unremarkable. P__ slowly got better, to the point where he was allowed to regain consciousness by Friday morning; the tube was removed several hours later. Nursing care in the CCY was as good as it should be: caring, competent, good nurse-to-patient ratio.

Saturday October 21

I visited for 1 ½ - 2 hours in the early afternoon, then went home for 1 ½- 2 hours. During this time, the hospital called and said that P__ had been transferred—NOT to Bayfront Medical, but to room 243, bed 2 (B?).

When I came back to visit him, the nurse assigned to P__ seemed very unsure of herself about giving him some medication by inhaler. It was a type of inhaler that we were unfamiliar with. P__ has used what is referred to as “rescue inhalers”, as well as a nebulizer in the past, and had received breathing treatments in the CCU as well as when he’d been in Bayfront. We were not familiar with the kind that the nurse was getting ready to use. According to the nurse, it was supposed to crush a pill so that P__ could inhale it. The nurse kept asking me, “Do you know how to use this?” When I told her I didn’t, she said that she would figure it out. I suggested she find someone on the floor who knew how to use the inhaler; she stated that she didn’t think anyone on the floor knew how to use it. I then mentioned that maybe she should contact Respiratory Therapy and get a Respiratory Technician up to the room either to administer the medication or to show her how to do it. At that point, the nurse stated, “No, that’s alright. I’ll figure this out." After having P__ breath twice into the inhaler, the nurse opened the inhaler, looked inside, and stated, “The pill is gone. I guess it worked."

While this nurse was in the room, I discovered through small talk that (1) she’d been an RN for 20 years, and that (2) she was nearing the end of a 12-hour shift.

My point is that if she was unsure of how to use this inhaler—or how to do any procedure—she should have asked for help. The pill in the inhaler may have been inhaled properly—or it could have lodged in any part of P__’s air passages.

Sunday October 22

Before I left home to visit, P__ called and asked if I would call the nurses’ station. When I asked why, he stated that he had gotten up to use the portable commode and that when he got up, his nasal canula had become disconnected from the oxygen supply. He stated that he had pulled the cord for the call-light and waited for 10 minutes for a nurse to arrive while trying to reconnect the tube.

I immediately called the nurses’ station and told the person who answered that someone needed to check P__ and why. That person told P__’s nurse, “You need to check room 243. He needs help reconnecting to his oxygen,” to which I heard the male nurse reply, “I was wondering why the light was on for the past ten minutes!” Ten minutes—and the nurse hadn’t checked? P__ could have been having chest pains, a possible heart attack, stroke—any number of problems.

Thing is, P__ was always fairly accurate about time; I kidded him about this over the years. I had watched him keep an eye on the clock on numerous occasions, to the point that if he told me he had waited 10 minutes, it was (fairly reliably) somewhere between 9 1/2 and 10 1/2 minutes. Also, I had overheard the nurse reply about the light being on "...for the past ten minutes."

Monday October 23

I received a call in the morning from P__ that he was to be discharged that day. He also mentioned that his hip was hurting. When I inquired if he had fallen, he denied falling. (He had broken his shoulder after a fall in May, so I was concerned about possible osteoporosis.)

I arrived around noon and was informed (by P__) that he had had nothing to eat that day. There was a food cart in the hallway, and other patients were observed to have lunch trays. I asked P__’s nurse why he had not received any meals that day, as he was diabetic and required both food and medication to keep his blood sugar levels in check. The nurse told me that since he was scheduled to be released, no meals had been ordered. I had to ask several times to have a meal brought up before one was finally ordered.

During this time, P__ continued to complain that his hip was bothering him. When I inquired about the possibility of having an X-Ray done, I was informed that one wasn’t necessary. “After all,” I was told, “we can’t X-Ray everyone for every little ache and pain.” This was said after I mentioned my concern over possible osteoporosis, both because of his age and the broken shoulder several months before.Between 2:45 and 3:00 p.m., P__ said he needed to use the bathroom. He stated that he had used the bathroom earlier (with the help of a walker), that his hip had hurt when he had walked to the bathroom, so I asked his nurse if it was okay for him to attempt to get up and go to the bathroom and was told it was okay.

However, when P__ attempted to get out of bed, he fell. I pulled the cord for the call-light. When no one came, the family of another patient in the room ran out and got the nurse. She came in and stated, “Somebody put the bed too high. That’s why he fell.” After helping me get P__ back into bed, she took his blood pressure, which was elevated. She then reiterated that there had been several tests run on P__ that day and that “one of the technicians must have raised the bed and forgot to lower it.”

Note: The other patient in the room was only there for part of one day and signed himself out of the hospital AMA after P__’s fall. I overheard him tell his family that he didn’t trust Northside.

Around 3:30, the nurse came back into the room with a syringe. When I asked her what it was and what it was for, she told me that it was for the high blood pressure and that I didn’t need to worry about what it was. I told her that she really needed to take another blood pressure, as it had been 30-45 minutes since the one elevated one, and that that one had been taken immediately after a fall, that there was a good probability that the BP had come down enough to either not need the medication at all or, at the very least, a lesser dose of the medication. However, she informed me, “I don’t have time to take another blood pressure right now” as she injected the medication into P__'s arm.At 4:30, the nurse stated she was almost done writing the incident report on the fall and that as soon as she was done, she’d give us the discharge papers. She also told me, "His doctor is on the floor. Please don’t tell him about the fall, as then he might want to keep P__ in the hospital longer.” At that point, I simply wanted to get P__ out of Northside so that I could bring him to Bayfront Medical.

Around 5:00, the nurse brought me the discharge papers and a wheelchair. She asked that, since they were extremely understaffed, would it be possible for me to please bring P__ down to the main entrance and help him leave? Again, I simply wanted him out of there. (At this point, she still had not taken another blood pressure--or any other vitals--even after giving the still unknown blood pressure medication!)

I got in touch with a friend of ours who drives for cab. K. arrived at approximately 5:30. I wheeled P__ out to the cab. K. stated, "I thought the hospital was supposed to have someone here to help him out!"

At this point, P__ stood up and immediately collapsed onto the ground. K. came around to help me pick P__ up but we were unable to do so. I ran inside and told the girl who was working the front desk what had happened and asked that she call for help, STAT. She assured me she’d get help right away. Five minutes later, when no help had arrived, I went back inside and asked where our help was.“I’ll call Security back and see what’s taking them so long,” she informed me. Security. For a medical problem. Of course.

I then ran around to the Emergency Room and told the Triage Nurse what had happened and that we needed help. She informed me that if I would simply put P__ back into the cab and drive around to the Emergency Room door, they’d help us. At that point, I picked up the nearest phone and dialed 911 to get help. After being assured that help was on the way, I hung up. The Triage Nurse asked who I’d called; when I told her, she asked me if I didn’t think that was “overkill” (her words).

By the time I got back to the front of the hospital, where K. was still trying to keep P__ as comfortable as possible, a nurse and a woman from Security were out front. The nurse never once made an effort to help, but kept asking why we had P__ on the ground. She then heard the sirens in the distance and said something about someone coming to the ER. I told the nurse I’d called 911. Her response was to ask if I could call them off; the woman Security Officer told the nurse that once 911 is activated, they couldn’t be called off, to which the nurse made a comment about my calling 911 “ridiculous”.

When the paramedics arrived, they were able to bring P__ around to the ER, where he was readmitted. It wasn’t until after the paramedics arrived that the nurse who had come out made a show of helping; before then, she wouldn’t call for help or make any attempt at helping.

After P__ was readmitted to the ER, one nurse worked on him for several hours. Periodically, the nurse mentioned P__’s blood pressure being very erratic.

Tuesday October 24

Shortly after 2 a.m., while still in the ER, P__ suffered a heart attack...After being moved to the CCU, P__ was hooked up to seven or eight bags of medicine. I was told that four of the bags were for medication to bring P__’s blood pressure back up, and that the medications were being pushed to the limit. He was also in the Trendelenburg position to help bring the blood flow to his brain and heart.

That same afternoon, his primary care physician came in to check on him and to talk with me about P__'s prognosis. The last time I talked with Dr. ___ face-to-face was shortly before 6:00 p.m. on the 24th. I was getting ready to head home. The visiting hours in the CCU ran until 6:00 p.m., then resumed from 8:00-10:00. This way, the staff could finish charts, do end-of-shift care while the new shift came on and everyone could get a complete run-down on the patients. Very necessary, somewhat time-consuming (I imagine), very hectic. Also, I had only gotten an hour's worth of sleep the night before, so I figured I'd forgo coming back in that evening, opting for seeing P__ the next morning.

Dr. ___ arrived shortly before visiting hours were over. Around this time, a technician came in to run an EEG on P__ which a neurologist had ordered. The technician told me that he would run the EEG after I left, then immediately get the results to the neurologist. The tech was kind, asking me if I had any questions, giving me a brief run-down on the procedure. Meanwhile, Dr. ___ proceeded to tell me, "We need to pull the plug on your husband."

"Why?" I wanted to know.

"He has no chance at all of any kind of recovery or meaningful life. He is brain-dead. We need to pull the plug now."

Hey, wait a minute. Who let him into this nightmare?

"Excuse me," I told him. "You're expecting what from me?"

"We can't pull the plug without your permission. And we need to pull the plug on him now. Tonight."

I informed him that, first off, I wanted to see what the EEG showed.

"That won't change anything. He's brain-dead."

"I want to check with the neurologist."

"That won't change anything. We need to pull the plug. You need to give me permission to pull the plug." Meanwhile the two or three others (I really don't know who they were) pulled closer around him. There's strength in numbers, they seemed to be stating.

I pointed out that I needed to sleep on this and to talk with P__'s sister. Also, I was going to talk with the neurologist first. Also, if Dr. ___ couldn't pull the plug without my permission, he was not going to get it that night. End of discussion.

Sometime between 7:30 and 8:00, I called the CCU and talked with P__'s night nurse, C__. C__ mentioned that Dr. ___ had made more noise about pulling the plug. "However, the neurologist did look at your husband's EEG. If you'd like, I can page her for you so you can talk with her." I thanked C__ and told her that I wanted to talk with the neurologist.

"Good," she told me. "I promise, we won't do anything except to continue our care for P__ until after you talk with Dr. (neurologist)."

I only had to wait a few minutes for the neurologist to call back. While she said that the EEG showed little, if any, activity, she did offer me this much hope: four (4) days. As she relayed to me, "After an incident like your husband experienced, it's not uncommon to see very little brain activity." However, in her experience, the first four days after such an incident held the key: either the patient would expire on his or her own (frequently within the first 24 hours), or they would stabilize, after which it would become clear that the patient was being kept alive by machines (in which case, letting the patient go was probably the kindest thing to do), or there would be some sign of improvement. She likened it to stories most of us hear on the news during the winter months: a person will fall through the ice, remain submerged for half an hour before being pulled out, and walk out of the hospital a week later, missing only the memory of that week. "Personally, if it were my loved one," she stated, "I'd give him the four days."

After being assured that she would call the CCU immediately, I thanked her. Five minutes later, I talked to C__ in the CCU; she had just hung up with Dr. (neurologist) and agreed that I had done what she felt was best for P__: given him a chance.

When P__ finally died at 10:44 p.m., the nurse working on him said that when he died, his blood pressure suddenly went haywire.My problem with Northside Hospital is that: 1) P__ wasn’t transferred to Bayfront Medical once he was stabilized, 2) the care (or lack thereof) contributed to P__’s death. Yes, he was in his early 70s and had had two previous heart attacks... However, while P__ was in N.side, several doctors wrote that his heart sounds were good. The heart attack that figured into the death happened after the administration of the medication to drastically bring his blood pressure down—and this was for a one-time BP reading taken immediately after a fall and not monitored thereafter.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Monday, July 09, 2007

Another (dis)satisfied patient...

Did anyone watch Channel 8's (WFLA, Tampa, FL) 6:00 news this evening? A woman, Gina Bernard, went into Northside Hospital back in (if I remember correctly) April. When she left a month later, it was without her $6,000 insulin pump that she had gone in with.

After numerous calls to Northside, Ms. Bernard finally contacted 8 On Your Side's Stacie Schaible. When Ms. Schaible first contacted Northside, she was told that there was no insulin pump with Ms. Bernard when she entered the hospital. Long story short, after much prodding and insistance, the hospital finally found the "non-existent" pump.

As soon as I am able to get a link from WFLA's site, I'll post it here. (And if anyone else runs across the link, please feel free to post it and let me know.)

I'm not the world's biggest Tom Clancey fan, but I don't dislike him. I am a big fan of one of his quotes, though, which is: "The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense." (From http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/t/tom_clancy.html) About the amount of problems at N.side Hospital, all I can add is, You can't make this stuff up.

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

Conference...and other notes of interest

First off, the phone conference with the new attorney went well. I should have the paperwork from him within a couple of weeks to look over and sign. Things are looking up...

There's a funny little glitch which was brought to my attention. When the main attorney signed on--for sake of ease, since this attorney's in Tampa, for this blog, I'll name him/her Pat Tampa--Pat informed me that a cursory look at the few records I had showed a DNR on file.

(For anyone unfamiliar with the terminology, a DNR is a "Do Not Resuscitate." This is a document signed by the patient or his/her spouse, guardian, or next of kin that says if the patient stops breathing, etc, nothing will be done to bring the patient back: no CPR, no mouth-to-mouth, nothing.)

I stated that: (1) I didn't recall signing a DNR for P__, (2) if one was signed, it was most likely slipped in amongst the paperwork signed when he was readmitted (after he'd been lying on the pavement for 30-45 minutes and I was stressed on beyond Pluto), (3) no one mentioned signing a DNR, (4) if one had been signed, would I really have been confronted by a group of three people between 1:00-1:30 a.m. the morning of October 24th who wanted to know, "If he Codes, do you want us to work on him by doing CPR, etc. to try to bring him back?" (to which I answered, "Definitely. Work on him."), and (5) would Dr. ____ (see blog post from May 4) have had to keep asking my permission to pull the plug?

And yet the cursory records stated there was a DNR in place.

I'm sure that there might be people who wonder if I'm telling the truth to everything written in this blog.

My answer is this: At 53, this is the first lawsuit I've filed (other than filing for divorce from my first husband years ago, well before I knew P__). There have been times I could have filed, but didn't.

On top of that, while grieving over the loss of the love of my life, it would simply be easier to let it go and go on. I'm sure that I could heal a lot faster if I didn't have to think about this lawsuit. And, on top of that, I do know, beyond the shadow of a doubt, that most medical people are good, decent, hard-working people who care for others at great personal costs to themselves. Anyone who doubts this should talk to someone whose marriage and personal life are taking a hit while they go through the rigors of medical school (or nursing school, paramedic/EMT training, any kind of technician training, etc.) Ask them as they put birthdays and holidays on hold while going through residency and internship. Look at the ambulances and fire departments still on call as you and I celebrate our major holidays. One word, folks: Dedication.

For most of these people, Dedication is part of the job. Pride in a job well done is another. I know that these words frequently sound almost goofy these days. But it's really there. Why? Because when you hang up your hat at the end of the shift and can say, "I made a difference today; that man/woman/child would be dead right now if I hadn't been there, doing my job. Now they have a chance."

And if the patient dies? I've seen grown men and women in the medical field in tears when they've worked hard against all odds and a patient dies. I've seen this (and experienced) both as an outsider, as well as when I worked as an EMT.

But when incident after incident of negligence and malpractice kill someone, I tend to get angry. Make that someone I care for...well, you get the picture.

On top of that, look at the people who've commented here; consider those who've contacted me through the reporter from the St. Petersburg Times. For the most part, they are people I've never heard of before starting this blog. They've all told and/or written the same thing: they have horror stories about N.side, too. I've also talked with people I know personally who've had problems with N.side before P__'s death. I'm not a rich, famous person who could get this many people to come forward with horror stories just to try to get close to me. These are real people, real lives, real horror stories about a hospital that is understaffed, about personnel who do things that maim and cause death.

That, my friends, is why I'm fighting mad. Will I give up?

If you've guessed that the answer is "No," you've guessed right.

Labels: , , , , ,

Monday, June 18, 2007

Gettin' good, folks...

Well, I've got a phone conference tomorrow with another lawyer. What, exactly, does this mean? There are now three--count 'em, three--lawyers on the case. Fine by me. This is one of those times when I love decent lawyers, especially when they're just a little bit outraged at a hospital's horrible mistreatment.

In response to Loretta's comment (in Un-flippin'-believable), I have yet to hear from the hospital directly. They've been trying to stall the main attorney(s) on the case by not wanting to give up his records.

As far as your husband's stay in N.side: Best care, huh? I guess next the woman who contacted you from the hospital will try telling you that both the Pope and the Dali Lama are Jewish...

My sarcasm is not directed at you; I've seen the way that hospital treats its patients. When my husband was lying on the pavement right outside the front door (after discharge and while we were waiting for EMS to come help him), the charge nurse informed us that she didn't need to help; as she put it, "Everyone is where they're supposed to be." (I wonder if that included my husband...lying on the pavement because of their screw-ups!)

I, too, have often wondered where the CEO and other big-wigs from Deathside send their loved ones when they're sick; if it's to that very same hospital, do they make sure, loud and clear, who their loved ones are related to so that they get decent care?

Not to worry, Loretta: I'm still going after them...me and my THREE LAWYERS!!!

Labels: , , , ,

Friday, June 01, 2007

Un-flippin'-believable

After being out most of the day, I just got around to checking my email about half an hour ago. One of the emails was from the attorney. Turns out N.side hasn't sent them the requested medical records.

"Why?" you might ask.

Turns out they need a copy of P__'s death certificate!!! The man died in their hospital at their hands, and they need proof that he's dead!!!

Now, there are those who will rightfully say that a sense of humor is not needed to live, at least not the way breathing and a viable heartbeat are. But it sure helps. That, and a true appreciation of warped irony.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Wednesday, April 25, 2007

lawyers and papers and blogs (oh, my)

Well, looks like there are 2 more lawyers interested in working with the lawyer in Jacksonville on the case against N.side; one of them is in Tampa. I'd write more about this, but on the off-chance that anyone from the hospital is reading this, that's all I'll say at this point.

Will add more here in the next week or so...

Labels: , , , , , ,

Saturday, April 07, 2007

A couple of more contacts...

Well, I have a few more contacts on Northside...By contacts, I don't mean people working there, but more dissatisfied people with complaints about them.

Now, granted, it seems that I have heard from one or two complaints about most hospitals in the area...At this point, it's not unheard of.

But what I've been hearing runs along the line of car stories: Ever notice how, if you mention "I just bought a used (fill in the blank with whatever type of car you own)..." you may hear, "Well, I'm a Ford (Chevy, Toyota) person, myself..." Occasionally, though, you'll hear, "I would never buy one of those; worst car I ever owned," or "I had one of those; great cars; you just can't kill them!" Soon, a pattern develops. And while you may hear an occasional dissenting voice, you'll soon discover that the vast majority of a certain car's owners (past and present) either would never buy another one or can't say enough good about that car.

Well, that's what I have been hearing about Northside--and I'm not hearing too many buyers! This includes the recent contacts. Granted, the staff I observed in the CCU were exceptional; I feel that I could reliably put my life in their hands and stand a fighting chance. (If any of you who work in the CCU and cared for my husband, you know who you are. Thank you. Honestly.) The rest of the hospital, especially the regular floors/wards, those of us from NY have a phrase: Fahgedaboudit!

How long will it take before this changes? How many more unnecessary deaths will it take before something changes?

Where do those in charge of N.side (and other HCA hospitals) take their loved ones when they're sick? If it's at an HCA hospital, do they get better treatment?

Anyone in charge have the guts to respond?

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, April 05, 2007

Music

I was almost ready to call it quits. It felt that everything has been moving too slowly. Here I am, only one person, trying to make a difference.

And yet...

Already I've heard from so many people who've had similar stories about horrible care (or lack of anything even vaguely resembling care); I have no doubt that there are countless more. There is no way that change will happen unless someone steps up and writes about this, unless someone pushes for change. Sometimes, change begins with simple exhaustion and just one person. Look at Rosa Parks.

Fortunately, a friend stopped by and at least got me laughing. Laughing is good. Then, a little while ago, I had a Melissa Etheridge CD on; ever listen to her song I Run For Life, her breast cancer song? Sort-of a "get up and do something" song. Now I've got Aretha Franklin belting out Respect.

So, onward and upward. I intend to keep going. We need to make sure Northside (and, consequently, the for-profit hospital system) realizes that we need good medical care. And a little respect wouldn't hurt...

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, January 25, 2007

I may finally have an attorney...

After talking with an attorney since just before Christmas, it looks like I may have someone to take the case against Northside Hospital. I've also talked with several other people who've had problems with Northside, and they're considering contacting the same lawyer.

The way I figure it, if Northside can't make sure they're going to give the best medical care possible, they should either 1) close or 2) clean up their act. To have someone die after getting good medical care is one thing; we all die, sooner or later. And if a hospital and/or medical practitioner, whether a doctor, nurse, nurse's aid, or technician, have given the patient the best possible medical care and done everything possible to make that patient either better or, in a terminal case, not worse, but comfortable and that patient still passes away, everyone--family, personnel, etc--can rest assured that it was that patient's "time", and that they at least had a chance. But to give slipshod care, no care at all, or to act in such a way as to hasten that patient's death when that patient may have had a chance, be it another 6 months or 6 decades, is an atrocity that must be addressed.

That's my point.

Labels: , , , ,